Notes on Tree 1002

The North East Branch

Origins

The current top of the tree is John Pluck and his wife Lucy Chambless who were married in 1812 at St Leonard's Shoreditch. They had at least eight children between 1813 and 1829. The eldest, John, was baptised in 1813 at Ponder's End Independent church and the rest at the parish church of St Andrew's in Enfield.

Nothing else is known at present about John and his origins. A possibility - no more than that at present - is PL412 in Tree 4 who was baptised in Arkesden on 23 September 1787.

No marriage records have been found yet for any of John and Lucy's eight children.

A move to Yorkshire

The story now moves to Eston, a parish on the eastern outskirts of present-day Middlesborough. On the first of November 1860 Thomas Pluck married Mary Ann Cawthorne at Eston Parish Church. They had at least five children between 1861 and 1876 and it is from this family that most of this tree has descended.

The Link to Enfield

The 1871 census of Eston records Thomas Pluck aged 35, foreman at an iron works, with his wife Mary Ann (32) and four sons: Arthur (9), Thomas (7), Alfred (5) and Frederick (1). Mary Ann was born at Wolviston in Durham, the four children in Eston, but Thomas' birth place was shown as Ponder's End, Middlesex.

Dave Pluck has a copy of Thomas and Mary Ann's marriage certificate in which Thomas' father is recorded as John Pluck, a joiner. John's marriage has not been found yet, but he is almost certainly the eldest son of John Pluck and Lucy Chambless.

Other Enfield Plucks

The IGI has several christenings at St Andrews Enfield where the parents are William and Elizabeth Pluck:

William could be a brother or cousin of John. The four christenings on the same date (23 September 1832) are puzzling. They could have been quadruplets but at that time the survival of even one would have been virtually impossible. Normally when multiple baptisms are found like this one assumes a new vicar, or curate, has arrived and is having a purge on backsliders. However, with the baptism of Emma barely 18 months previously, this is most unlikely. There is probably a transcription error in the data which have been taken from the IGI. An examination of the original parish registers will probably provide the answer.

Other "Orphan" Records

Mary Pluck: b. Q3 1901 Middlesborough RD d. Q3 1906 Middlesborough RD

Florence Pluck: d. Q1 1962 Middlesborough RD

©2007 Derrick Porter